Site icon Purific

How Lab Water System Reliability Changes With Age

High-purity water systems often go unnoticed — until they fail.
When they do, they disrupt analyser uptime, delay results, and increase stress for lab staff.

To understand how reliability changes over time, we analysed our call logs calls and mapped them against the age of the machines.
The year-by-year chart shows a clear pattern.


What the Data Shows

Early Years (0–3)
Most calls were not hardware failures but:

These can largely be prevented with better install checklists and simple staff guidance.


Middle Years (4–7)
Units in this range are generally stable and low-cost provided they receive routine preventive maintenance.


Wear-Out Years (7–10)
Calls begin to rise as components age:

Proactive part swaps from year 7 can prevent many emergency visits.


Reliability Spike (10–12)
This is the peak for service calls, dominated by age-related failures of pumps, probes, fittings and filter heads.

For high-throughput labs, planned refurbishment or replacement is often more cost-effective than repeated urgent repairs.


Long-Life Tail (15 + Years)
Legacy units still running often need multiple interventions per year and carry higher downtime risks.

A retirement or rebuild plan for units over 15 years old is essential.


Root-Cause Patterns


Practical Actions


The Take-Home Message

Early-life issues are mostly preventable with good installation and training.
True wear-out starts around year 7 and peaks at 10–12 years.
By acting early and planning ahead, labs can avoid most urgent failures, lower lifetime costs, and keep analysers running when they’re needed most.

Exit mobile version